Innovative AI Technologies in the Digital Era: A Comparative Study of SearchGAEP, ChatGPT, and Google

Abstract

In today's rapidly advancing technological landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of information retrieval, content creation, and goal achievement. This comparative study evaluates three prominent AI-driven platforms: Ferct  (SearchGAEP), OpenAI (ChatGPT), and Google (Google Search). The analysis focuses on their core functionalities, technological differences, and market impact, highlighting their unique offerings in goal setting, generative content, and information retrieval. By juxtaposing their algorithms, usability, and growth potential, this article seeks to provide insights into how each platform is revolutionizing its domain.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI); ChatGPT; Generative Artificial Intelligence; Digital transformation; Natural Language Processing (NLP)

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of the digital era, the integration of innovative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has transformed how individuals and organizations access and utilize information [1]. As the volume of data generated daily continues to escalate, the need for advanced tools to navigate and interpret this vast array of content becomes increasingly critical. Among these tools, SearchGAEP, ChatGPT, and Google stand out as prominent representatives of AI-driven solutions that cater to different facets of information retrieval and user interaction. AI-based tools have permeated numerous sectors, from search engines to personalized assistants [2]. This study offers a side-by-side comparison of three influential platforms: Ferct’s SearchGAEP (the world’s first AI-powered goal search engine), OpenAI's ChatGPT (the most popular generative language model in the world), and Google (the world’s leading search engine) as shown in Table 1. Each tool, driven by its proprietary algorithms, approaches user needs from different angles: achieving goals, generating content, and retrieving web-based information, respectively

Table 1: A Comprehensive Comparison Between SearchGAEP, ChatGPT, and Google Seach 

This research paper aims to conduct a comparative study of these three innovative technologies, examining their unique functionalities, strengths, and weaknesses. SearchGAEP, an emerging AI-powered search engine, leverages executive AI techniques to display executive paths for goal achievement, offering users a more tailored experience. In contrast, ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art conversational agent, facilitates natural language interactions, enabling users to engage in dialogue and obtain information in a more intuitive manner [3]. Google, as a long-standing leader in the search engine domain, incorporates advanced algorithms and AI capabilities to deliver fast and relevant search results, while also continuously adapting to user behavior and preferences. By analyzing these platforms, this study seeks to provide valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of each technology within the context of information retrieval and user engagement. Through this comparative framework, we aim to identify best practices and potential areas for future development in AI technologies, thereby contributing to the ongoing discourse on the role of AI in enhancing information accessibility and usability in the digital age.

Overview of Platforms

The fundamental difference between SearchGAEP, OpenAI, and Google lies in their core products and how they interact with user needs.

• SearchGAEP introduces a novel approach by offering a Goal Search Engine (SearchGAEP), providing executive paths to achieve personal and professional objectives.
• OpenAI leverages Generative AI with ChatGPT to create human-like text and media outputs.
• Google, established in 1995, focuses on indexing the web to display relevant information based on a query through its Predictive AI and indexed search algorithms [4].

Each of these platforms serves distinct purposes, and the comparison revolves around their technological frameworks, user interaction models, and market positioning.

AI Type and Model Differences

• SearchGAEP uses Executive AI with a focus on assisting users in achieving their personal or professional goals. Unlike traditional AI systems that provide general information or generate text, SearchGAEP’s Task Cluster Models (TCMs) analyze goals and tasks to create executive paths. These paths consist of actionable steps tailored to the user’s goals, considering real-time data and user preferences. The AI type here is highly practical, aimed at solving real-world problems by guiding users through their goal journey. This makes SearchGAEP unique as it doesn’t just present information or create content, but actively works to help users complete their objectives.
• ChatGPT relies on Generative AI to create human-like content from input prompts. Its Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained on vast datasets from the internet, allowing it to generate natural language outputs [5]. However, it has limitations in terms of accuracy, particularly when responding to highly specialized or evolving queries, since it can only generate information based on what it has been trained on (up until 2023). ChatGPT excels in content creation but may sometimes present outdated or incorrect information because it lacks real-time data integration.
• Google employs Predictive AI, relying on algorithms that predict the most relevant search results based on user queries [6]. The predictive model works by indexing billions of web pages, constantly updating its repository with new information. Google's search engine remains the most powerful in terms of providing vast quantities of information across a wide range of subjects. Its strength is in scale and speed, but it often sacrifices personalization, as it returns results based on search keywords rather than personal goals or content generation.

User Interaction and Personalization

• SearchGAEP stands out in its ability to personalize user experiences. Registered users benefit from highly tailored executive paths based on their history, preferences, and specific goals. This level of personalization means that SearchGAEP is not just a passive tool, but one that actively engages with the user's objectives, acting almost like a mentor or guide.
• ChatGPT also offers a degree of personalization, but it’s session-based [6]. As users provide more input, ChatGPT can adjust its responses accordingly, but it doesn’t have the same level of persistence or long-term goal tracking that SearchGAEP offers. However, for generating creative outputs or solving immediate problems, ChatGPT’s conversational abilities make it highly effective.
• Google Search, by contrast, offers the least amount of personalization among the three. While it does tailor search results based on user history and preferences, it’s more of a one-way interaction. Google doesn't create goal-specific recommendations or engage in long-term user journeys. It excels in delivering vast amounts of information but lacks depth in understanding user-specific contexts or goals.

Results and Usability

• SearchGAEP focuses on delivering a limited number of highly relevant results. This is by design, as the platform’s aim is to guide users down an actionable path rather than overwhelm them with options. The results are usually 1-3 executive paths, which are clear and directly related to the user's goal, making it easy for users to understand what actions they need to take next. This is especially useful in goal-oriented tasks, where having too many choices can hinder decision-making.
• ChatGPT similarly provides limited results—typically concise summaries or specific answers—but its focus is more on creative and content-based outputs rather than actionable steps. This makes it ideal for scenarios where users need ideas, explanations, or conversational assistance but may require more interaction and refinement to get exactly what they need.
• Google, in contrast, delivers billions of results, making it both comprehensive and, at times, overwhelming. While this breadth is useful for research or when looking for specific information, users may have to sift through pages of results to find what’s most relevant to their needs. Google’s strength lies in its vast index of web pages and real-time updates, but it’s less suited for those looking for personalized or goal-specific guidance.

Innovation and Market Potential

• SearchGAEP’s innovation comes from being the first Goal Search Engine (SearchGAEP) that provides users with actionable steps toward achieving their objectives. Its Executive AI approach is groundbreaking because it merges task management with AI-driven decision-making, allowing users to achieve complex goals by following clear, data-driven paths. SearchGAEP operates in a niche market—Executive AI—which is still in its infancy but has massive growth potential. As people increasingly seek tools that help them streamline personal and professional tasks, SearchGAEP could redefine how we think about achieving success.
• OpenAI’s ChatGPT is also innovative as a pioneer in Generative AI. Its ability to generate human-like content has numerous applications, from content creation and education to customer service and entertainment. The Generative AI market is experiencing rapid growth, driven by increasing demand for tools that can create text, media, and even art [6]. ChatGPT’s competitive edge lies in its versatility, although it will need to address challenges related to accuracy and bias as it continues to evolve.
• Google, while not necessarily breaking new ground in recent years, remains the undisputed leader in the Predictive AI and search engine market. Its market size dwarfs those of SearchGAEP and ChatGPT, thanks to its dominance in digital advertising and its comprehensive suite of products. Although Google’s search engine is highly effective at providing information, it faces increasing competition from AI-driven tools like SearchGAEP and ChatGPT that offer more personalized and interactive experiences.

Growth, Investment, and Revenue

• Ferct, being in its seed stage, offers tremendous growth opportunities. The Executive AI market is not yet fully realized, but with the growing need for executive AI, SearchGAEP could see rapid adoption.  Another market size for Ferct is digital transformation, was USD 943.97 billion in 2023, estimated at USD 1,184.68 billion in 2024 and is anticipated to reach around USD 10,756.69 billion by 2034, expanding at a CAGR of 27.68% from 2024 to 2030. Its business model, with multiple revenue streams such as advertising, subscriptions, and commissions, is scalable, particularly as users seek tools that save time, money, and effort in achieving their goals.
• OpenAI, already well-funded, is poised for exponential growth in the Generative AI sector, which is forecasted to reach $356.10 billion by 2030. Its subscription model, alongside enterprise partnerships, ensures a steady revenue stream. However, the challenge for OpenAI will be maintaining accuracy and addressing the biases inherent in its data.
• Google, with its massive $740.3 billion digital advertising market, operates in a mature sector. While its growth rate is lower than that of SearchGAEP or OpenAI, it remains highly profitable. Google’s advantage lies in its established infrastructure and wide array of complementary services (e.g., Maps, Flights, Books), which add value beyond simple information retrieval.

Technological Comparison

The table reveals stark contrasts between the types of AI and models these platforms employ.

• SearchGAEP uses Executive AI and relies on Task Cluster Models (TCMs) to create goal-oriented paths. It integrates user data and real-time information to offer executive paths tailored to individual goals.
• OpenAI’s ChatGPT employs Large Language Models (LLMs), trained on a vast corpus of text data up to 2023, to understand and generate human-like responses based on prompts [7].
• Google relies on a Worldwide Search Engine model, utilizing Predictive AI to index and classify web content, providing billions of results to users with a focus on relevance and speed.

Algorithms and Data Sources

SearchGAEP’s algorithms analyze complex task paths using live data to build goal-specific results. OpenAI’s GPT models create content based on learned patterns from pre-existing text data, while Google indexes a vast array of web pages, constantly updating from live internet sources.

Functionalities and Capabilities

The unique features of each platform dictate their usage scope and applications:

• SearchGAEP prioritizes goal achievement, curating executive paths with a focus on saving time, effort, and resources for users pursuing specific objectives.
• OpenAI’s ChatGPT emphasizes content creation, generating creative and unique outputs in text and media formats  [5]. It excels in generating conversations, summaries, and media but may struggle with accuracy in certain contexts.
• Google offers information retrieval, indexing billions of web pages to provide users with links, data, and additional services like Maps or Flights. Its main strength lies in the breadth of accessible information.

Personalization and Interaction

SearchGAEP stands out for its high level of personalization, adjusting paths based on user goals, history, and profile. ChatGPT also offers some degree of personalization, depending on user prompts and session history, while Google offers low personalization, focusing primarily on user data and search history.

Interaction across these platforms varies significantly:

• SearchGAEP delivers executive paths, interacting with users through action-based steps for achieving goals.
• ChatGPT engages users through conversational AI, generating human-like responses.
• Google, with its one-way interaction model, provides links and relevant information in response to queries.

User Experience and Results

Each platform provides distinct user experiences and result formats:

• SearchGAEP offers limited but highly relevant executive paths, guiding users to achieve their specific goals. The interface centers around actionable steps, often limiting results to 1-3 relevant options.
• ChatGPT generates concise responses based on user inputs, providing similarly limited results, while Google delivers billions of indexed results, giving users a comprehensive overview of available information.

The speed of result delivery varies as well:

• SearchGAEP and Google offer near-instantaneous results, while ChatGPT takes time to generate responses, reflecting the complexities of generative AI.

Market Impact and Growth

The market sizes of Executive AI, Generative AI, and Digital Advertising show vastly different growth trajectories.

• SearchGAEP, in its early stages, operates in the emerging Executive AI market, expected to grow significantly as its technology matures and user adoption increases.
• OpenAI, already established, is experiencing robust growth, with the generative AI market forecasted to expand at a 46.47% CAGR through 2030.
• Google, as the leader in digital advertising, operates in a more stable but slower-growing market, projected at a 6.87% CAGR until 2028.

Investment and Revenue Models

• SearchGAEP is currently in its seed stage, attracting investments based on its innovative executive paths and offering multiple revenue streams, including advertising and subscription plans.
• OpenAI, with large-scale investments, primarily generates revenue through subscription-based services like ChatGPT Plus.
• Google’s business model spans multiple revenue streams, from advertising to subscription services, leveraging its dominance in digital advertising.

The Rise of Executive AI and SearchGAEP’s Unique Position

Executive AI, as pioneered by SearchGAEP, represents an emerging category of artificial intelligence focused on personal and professional goal achievement. Unlike traditional AI that simply assists with tasks or answers queries, Executive AI is designed to take a more proactive role in guiding users to their objectives. This shift from passive to active AI usage marks a new frontier in human-AI collaboration.

Key Differentiators of Executive AI:

• Active Assistance: SearchGAEP doesn’t just provide information or content. It helps users plan, execute, and complete tasks that are specifically tailored to their objectives. This transforms AI from a mere tool into an active partner in the user’s journey.
• User-Centric Design: SearchGAEP’s design centers around helping individuals and organizations achieve measurable outcomes. Its AI learns from users' preferences, habits, and goals to create personalized paths. As a result, the system becomes more efficient and effective over time, unlike other AI platforms that might only learn from past prompts or search history.
• Live Data Integration: One of SearchGAEP’s standout features is its reliance on live data. This is crucial for creating executive paths that adapt to real-time changes in a user’s environment, such as shifting project deadlines, evolving business landscapes, or changing personal goals. This allows for dynamic goal management, which is highly valuable in fast-paced environments where priorities can change rapidly.

Future Potential of SearchGAEP and Executive AI:

SearchGAEP’s beta stage indicates that it’s still in the process of refining its technology. However, as more users engage with the platform and its algorithms improve, we can expect to see:

• Deeper personalization: As SearchGAEP collects more data, it will become increasingly adept at creating highly customized executive paths, potentially predicting user goals before they are explicitly stated.
• Cross-industry applications: SearchGAEP’s AI could be integrated into industries such as business  management, education, healthcare, agriciculture  and personal development, where structured goal achievement is critical. For businesses, this could mean AI-driven workflows that help teams accomplish tasks more efficiently.
• Collaborative AI ecosystems: In the future, SearchGAEP could integrate with other AI systems to provide a holistic approach to goal achievement. For example, linking with productivity apps or knowledge-sharing platforms could allow SearchGAEP to pull in even more data and offer multi-functional task paths.

Generative AI’s Evolution and ChatGPT’s Challenges

OpenAI's ChatGPT exemplifies the potential of Generative AI, which is transforming how we interact with technology by enabling machines to create content that mimics human creativity. This technology is not limited to text; it can also be applied to generate images, music, code, and even entire websites.

Key Strengths of Generative AI:

• Creativity and Flexibility: ChatGPT’s ability to generate content in multiple languages, adapt to different tones, and understand context makes it incredibly versatile [3]. From creative writing to technical documentation, it can assist users across diverse tasks.
• Time Efficiency: By creating original content on demand, ChatGPT saves users time, especially in industries like marketing, journalism, and education, where quick content generation is crucial.

Ongoing Challenges and Opportunities:

• Bias and Accuracy: One of the most significant challenges for ChatGPT, and generative models in general, is maintaining accuracy and fairness [8]. Since ChatGPT is trained on large datasets, it can sometimes produce biased or factually incorrect outputs [9]. To overcome this, ChatGPT will need to refine its models to incorporate real-time data and ethical AI principles.
• Contextual Understanding: Generative AI, while powerful, still struggles with deep contextual understanding. Although it can simulate understanding in conversation, it can miss the nuances of real-world complexity, which could result in generic or unsuitable content for more complex tasks. Addressing this gap will likely involve combining generative AI with more sophisticated reasoning models in the future.
• Collaborative Content Creation: In the future, ChatGPT and other generative AI systems could work alongside humans in co-creative environments. For example, a designer might generate initial concepts using AI and then refine them, or a writer might use AI-generated suggestions as a starting point for more in-depth articles. This could lead to the rise of AI-assisted creativity, where human and machine work in tandem to create superior results.

Google’s Search Evolution and Predictive AI

Google’s search engine remains a dominant force in information retrieval, using Predictive AI to analyze and rank billions of web pages in real-time. Google’s AI predicts what information users need based on search behavior, keywords, and data history, but it operates within a more static framework compared to SearchGAEP or ChatGPT.

Strengths of Google’s Predictive AI:

• Speed and Scale: Google’s unmatched ability to index and retrieve vast quantities of information almost instantaneously is one of its key strengths [10]. It offers real-time updates and access to almost any type of content available on the web.
• Multifunctionality: Beyond search, Google integrates AI into other services like Maps, Flights, and Google Assistant, creating a more holistic user experience across multiple domains.

Opportunities for Further Innovation:

• Search Personalization: While Google does offer some degree of personalization based on search history, it remains largely a one-way interaction tool. The future of search may involve integrating more advanced personalization features, similar to what SearchGAEP offers, where Google could provide goal-based suggestions rather than merely ranking existing web pages.
• Contextual Awareness: Google is already experimenting with contextual understanding through its BERT and MUM algorithms, but the search engine could evolve to offer more context-aware search results that better understand the intent behind queries. This would make search results more relevant to a user’s personal or professional goals.
• Beyond Search: As AI continues to evolve, Google could expand beyond search into more proactive, predictive services, where the AI not only returns results but also suggests actions or solutions based on user behavior. For example, Google could predict tasks a user might want to accomplish and offer AI-generated solutions, bridging the gap between information retrieval and actionable advice.

Market Trends and Impact on Industries

Each of these platforms—Ferct, OpenAI, and Google—operates in rapidly expanding markets, but their growth will influence different sectors in unique ways.

SearchGAEP’s Impact:

• Personal Development and Coaching: As SearchGAEP gains traction, industries like life coaching, personal development, and project management may be disrupted. SearchGAEP’s AI could automate many aspects of coaching by providing structured executive paths for personal and professional growth.
• Corporate Performance Management: Businesses could also benefit from SearchGAEP’s approach, particularly in employee performance tracking and goal setting. Companies might use SearchGAEP’s AI to help employees achieve key performance indicators (KPIs), streamlining goal-setting processes across teams.

OpenAI’s Impact:

• Content Creation and Media: OpenAI’s generative models are already transforming how content is created. As the technology improves, it could further disrupt industries like marketing, journalism, advertising, and even entertainment. AI-generated films, music, and video games could become more common, leading to AI-human collaborative creativity.
• Customer Service and Automation: ChatGPT’s conversational abilities also have significant implications for customer service automation. As businesses seek to streamline interactions, generative AI could handle a larger volume of customer queries, improving response times while reducing costs.

Google’s Impact:

• Information Retrieval and Digital Advertising: Google’s dominance in digital advertising and search will continue to shape how businesses market their products. However, as AI-driven personalization tools become more advanced, Google may need to evolve beyond traditional search to retain its market share, possibly by moving into more integrated AI solutions.

The Future of AI Integration

Looking ahead, the convergence of different AI types could lead to AI ecosystems, where Executive AI (SearchGAEP), Generative AI (OpenAI), and Predictive AI (Google) work together to offer seamless user experiences. Imagine a scenario where:

• SearchGAEP helps users define a goal,
• OpenAI generates the creative assets or content needed to achieve that goal,
• Google retrieves the most relevant real-time information and resources to support the goal.

This cross-platform integration could redefine how we interact with AI and technology in the future. AI assistants might become more holistic, offering solutions that range from planning and content creation to information retrieval and execution—effectively automating much of our decision-making processes.

Innovation, Challenges and Future Outlook

SearchGAEP is positioned as the first of its kind in the Executive AI domain, pioneering a new approach to goal achievement. OpenAI and Google, both leaders in their respective domains, continue to innovate, but their focus areas—generative content and search—remain distinct.

Each platform brings unique advantages and faces challenges in terms of usability, accuracy, and scalability. SearchGAEP, in particular, has the potential to disrupt the goal setting and achievement space, with anticipated high growth rates and innovative technology that tailors user experiences to specific objectives.

SearchGAEP faces the challenge of proving its effectiveness in a competitive AI landscape. As an early-stage platform, it will need to refine its algorithms, expand its language support, and ensure that it can scale its executive path technology to meet diverse user needs. Its success will depend on user adoption and its ability to deliver real, measurable outcomes for users’ goals. OpenAI must contend with the limitations of Generative AI, particularly when it comes to maintaining accuracy and handling diverse, real-time inputs. Its success hinges on improving its data integration and fine-tuning its conversational capabilities to handle more nuanced tasks. Google, while still dominant, is facing pressure from AI-based tools that offer more personalized and interactive experiences. Google will need to continue innovating in AI, possibly integrating more personalized features or expanding into the executive or generative spaces to remain competitive.

Conclusion

The comparison of SearchGAEP, OpenAI, and Google highlights how these AI-driven platforms cater to distinct user needs. SearchGAEP’s innovation in executive path creation contrasts with OpenAI’s focus on generative content and Google’s dominance in information retrieval. As each platform evolves, their technological capabilities and market influence will shape the future of AI-driven services. SearchGAEP’s potential lies in its ability to redefine how individuals achieve their goals, positioning itself as a game-changer in the emerging Executive AI space.

SearchGAEP, OpenAI, and Google each occupy unique positions in the AI ecosystem. SearchGAEP’s focus on goal achievement, OpenAI’s leadership in content generation, and Google’s dominance in information retrieval provide different value propositions. As AI technologies continue to evolve, each platform will face new opportunities and challenges. SearchGAEP has the potential to become a game-changer in the Executive AI space, while OpenAI will likely continue driving innovation in Generative AI. Google, as a market leader, must adapt to the shifting landscape by incorporating more personalized and interactive features to retain its competitive edge.

In the coming years, the integration of AI into daily tasks, whether for goal achievement, content creation, or information retrieval, will transform how users interact with technology. These platforms, with their distinct capabilities, will play key roles in shaping that future.

Declaration of competing interest

The author declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References 

1.         Borges, A.F., et al., The strategic use of artificial intelligence in the digital era: Systematic literature review and future research directions. International journal of information management, 2021. 57: p. 102225.

2.         Rashid, A.B. and A.K. Kausik, AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: a comprehensive overview of its diverse applications. Hybrid Advances, 2024: p. 100277.

3.         Bansal, G., et al., Transforming conversations with AI—a comprehensive study of ChatGPT. Cognitive Computation, 2024: p. 1-24.

4.         D’Amuri, F. and J. Marcucci, The predictive power of Google searches in forecasting US unemployment. International Journal of Forecasting, 2017. 33(4): p. 801-816.

5.         Roumeliotis, K.I. and N.D. Tselikas, Chatgpt and open-ai models: A preliminary review. Future Internet, 2023. 15(6): p. 192.

6.         Das, A.S., et al. Google news personalization: scalable online collaborative filtering. in Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. 2007.

7.         Yang, J., et al., Harnessing the power of llms in practice: A survey on chatgpt and beyond. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2024. 18(6): p. 1-32.

8.         Fui-Hoon Nah, F., et al., Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. 2023, Taylor & Francis. p. 277-304.

9.         Sohail, S.S., et al., Decoding ChatGPT: a taxonomy of existing research, current challenges, and possible future directions. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 2023: p. 101675.

10.       Haider, J. and O. Sundin, Invisible search and online search engines: The ubiquity of search in everyday life. 2019: Taylor & Francis.